Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics: A Narrative Review of Biomechanical Foundations, Clinical Protocols, and Technological Advances

Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) have become integral in contemporary orthodontic biomechanics, providing reliable skeletal anchorage independent of dental support or patient compliance. This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence regarding TADs classification, design parameters, biomechanical principles, clinical insertion protocols, complication management, and technological innovations. We reviewed foundational literature and recent clinical studies with emphasis on factors affecting primary and secondary stability, including insertion torque, angulation, cortical bone characteristics, and soft-tissue considerations. Self-drilling techniques are generally preferred for maxillary sites, while pre-drilling remains indicated in dense mandibular bone to reduce thermal risk and torque overload. Clinical success is optimized when insertion torque is maintained between 5 and 10 N·cm and site-specific anatomy is respected. Reported survival rates exceed 85–95% when proper protocols are followed. While TADs are associated with relatively low complication rates, failures are usually early and linked to excessive torque, poor hygiene, or inflammation. New technologies such as cone-beam computed tomography-guided placement, 3D-printed surgical guides, and AI-based planning tools offer promising avenues for safer and more individualized treatment. In conclusion, TADs represent a predictable and versatile option for skeletal anchorage in orthodontics, provided that mechanical design, biological adaptation, and clinical handling are coherently integrated into patient-specific strategies.