Analysis reveals treatment discontinuation and safety trends in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis patients on abatacept, suggesting factors influencing long-term stability.
Objective We investigated the factors associated with treatment discontinuation and safety of abatacept treatment up to 5 years as the first-line biologic in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of moderate disease activity (MDA). Methods We analysed 5-year data from the Orencia® Registry in Geographically Assembled Multicenter Investigation (ORIGAMI; UMIN000021263). We examined the factors associated with treatment discontinuation, overall and age-stratified safety, and effectiveness. Results Among 279 analysed patients, the cumulative incidence (95% CI) of discontinuation was 0.210 (0.158–0.262) for insufficient effectiveness and 0.266 (0.208–0.323) for adverse events (AEs). Older age (subdistribution hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.970 [0.946–0.995]; P = .018) and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody-positive status (0.284 [0.140–0.575]; P < .001) were associated with lower risk of discontinuation due to insufficient effectiveness. Presence of comorbidities was associated with greater risk of discontinuation due to AEs. The frequencies of AEs and adverse drug reactions remained stable or decreased over time. The safety was consistent with prior analyses of ORIGAMI and comparable among three age-groups (<65, ≥65 to <75, and ≥75 years). Conclusions Five-year results of the ORIGAMI study provide further evidence supporting the factors associated with long-term treatment continuation and safety of subcutaneous abatacept in patients with RA of MDA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harigai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: