Mixed-methods study demonstrates effective interventions for enhancing identity development in adolescents, suggesting improved engagement in gifted males.
This study investigated the effectiveness of a one-on-one counseling intervention for underachieving gifted adolescents, recognizing that not all excel academically despite their high cognitive abilities. Underachievement in this group can lead to detrimental consequences in both the short and long term. The research explored whether a tailored intervention can enhance engagement and mitigate underachievement. It distinguishes between two pathways leading to underachievement and designs specific modules for each. One module targets students’ self-beliefs, fostering a growth mindset and minimizing self-handicapping, while the other aims to boost students’ valuation of schoolwork by influencing various factors. Employing a mixed-methods single-case approach, the study involved eight gifted male adolescents aged 13 to 16, with four participating in each module. Findings indicated that while both modules affected outcomes, particularly in identity development, there were variations in effectiveness. This research sheds light on the development of interventions to address underachievement in cognitively gifted adolescents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sypré et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: