This article redefines gifted underachievement, exploring diagnosis and intervention approaches for diverse outcomes.
Gifted underachievement indicates a gap between what one is expected to achieve given demonstrated gifted potential and what is actually attained in school. Gifted underachievement has long been defined as an ability-achievement gap calculated by test scores and GPA. With a current understanding of human potential not as a fixed capacity but as growing with experience and learning, this article presents a new conceptualization, situating possible underachievement in context, wherein the dynamics of person × task × situation interaction determine the outcome. Consequently, the authors propose a diagnosis-intervention approach to find out what exactly transpires in situ, resulting in a typology of underachievement that can differentiate multiple types of underachievement and facilitate targeted interventions. The effort to revamp the notion of gifted underachievement is guided by a new paradigm of talent development to make gifted education scientifically more compelling, socially more equitable, and educationally more productive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: