This analysis quantifies pipeline resilience and adaptive capacity in gas transmission networks, indicating critical performance indicators for safety and reliability.
As critical national energy arteries, long-distance large-scale cross-regional gas transmission networks are characterized by high operating pressures, extensive spatial coverage, and complex topological structures. Thus, the multi-hazard profiles threatening its safety and reliability operation differ significantly from those of local urban gas distribution networks. This research develops a resilience assessment framework capable of quantifying resistance, adaptation, and recovery capacities of such energy systems. The framework establishes performance indicator systems based on design parameters, installation environments, and construction methods for long-distance trunk pipelines and key facilities such as storage facilities. Furthermore, based on complex network theory, the size of the largest connected component and global efficiency of the transmission network are selected as core topological metrics to characterize functional scale retention and transmission efficiency under disturbances, respectively, with corresponding quantification methods proposed. A cross-regional pipeline transmission network within a representative municipal-level administrative region in China is used as a case for empirical analysis. The quantitative assessment results of pipeline and network resilience are analyzed. The research indicates that trunk pipeline resilience is significantly affected by characteristic parameters, the laying environment, and installation methods. It is notably observed that installation methods like jacking and directional drilling, used for road or river crossings, offer greater resistance than direct burial but considerably lower restoration capacity due to the complexity of both the environment and the repair processes, which increases time and cost. Moreover, simulation-based comparison of recovery strategies demonstrates that, in this case, a repair-time-prioritized strategy more effectively enhances overall adaptive capacity and restoration efficiency than a node-degree-prioritized strategy. The findings provide quantitative analytical tools and decision-support references for resilience assessment and optimization of cross-regional energy transmission networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: