Non-invasive eyedrops using a nanocarrier system achieve retinal drug delivery, suggesting new treatments for retinal diseases.
Topical drug delivery to the posterior eye segment remains a significant challenge due to ocular anatomical barriers, particularly in diseases such as wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD), where treatment typically relies on frequent intravitreal (IVT) injections of anti-angiogenic agents. In this study, we present a non-invasive eye drop formulation of axitinib (AXT), a potent vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, encapsulated within 25-nm dual-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (AXT@dual-MSNs) engineered for efficient retinal delivery. The nanoparticles feature sulfonate-functionalized mesopores that enhanced AXT loading and solubilization, along with a PEGylated/quaternary ammonium-modified surface that improved colloidal stability and favored intramesopore drug confinement. Following topical administration, AXT@dual-MSNs achieved retinal accumulation via the conjunctiva-sclera-choroid pathway, effectively bypassing the corneal route. A pharmacokinetic analysis confirmed rapid, transscleral delivery of AXT with therapeutically relevant concentrations in the retina. In a laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) mouse model, a well-established surrogate for wet AMD, AXT@dual-MSN eyedrops significantly suppressed neovascular lesion formation, outperforming free-drug eyedrops and IVT AXT injection. Notably, the formulation exhibited excellent ocular tolerance, with no evidence of local toxicity or contralateral eye exposure. This work introduces a novel nanocarrier system capable of overcoming the longstanding delivery barrier to the posterior eye segment via eyedrops, offering a safe, effective, and clinically translatable alternative to IVT injections. The modular design of AXT@dual-MSNs also holds promise for expanding topical access to other hydrophobic or labile therapeutics targeting retinal diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: