Observational study improved remote resolution in primary care with electronic consultation, indicating potential for digital transformation.
Background Electronic consultation (e-consultation) has proven effective in optimising communication between primary care and cardiology, reducing waiting times and unnecessary face-to-face referrals. Integrating remote diagnostic tools may further enhance its resolving capacity. Objective To assess the impact of incorporating tele-echocardiography and event-based electrocardiographic monitoring (EEM) within an advanced e-consultation model between primary care and cardiology. Tele-echocardiography and event-based ECG monitoring are alternative tools activated according to clinical criteria, not cumulative interventions. Tele-echocardiography or EEM are requested alternatively based on predefined clinical indications. Methods This prospective observational study included 1,200 consecutive e-consultations conducted in the A Estrada health district (Galician Health Service). In 354 cases, the advanced pathway was activated, with cardiologists requesting tele-echocardiography (n = 300) or EEM (n = 54). Echocardiographic studies were performed by a certified family physician and subsequently interpreted by the cardiologist. Results Remote resolution increased from 38.0% in the conventional e-consultation model to 54.3% in the advanced model (P < .01), allowing 195 additional cases to be resolved without face-to-face visits. Only 6.7% of tele-echocardiographic studies were non-interpretable. Diagnostic agreement was high (κ = 0.85 for tele-echo vs standard echo; κ = 0.75 for primary care vs cardiologist interpretation), with no major adverse events during a mean follow-up of 19 months. Conclusions This study represents one of the first structured implementations of tele-echocardiography and event-based ECG monitoring within a cardiologist-supervised e-consultation model. It suggests a potentially scalable and sustainable innovation aligned with the digital transformation goals promoted by the European Society of Cardiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez‐Castro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: