Analysis highlights discrepancies in self-reported and Fitbit data in fitness tracking research, suggesting survey data improvements are needed.
Online surveys are used extensively in fitness-tracking research. One common limitation is that researchers cannot assess the veracity of participants' self-reported physical activity data. One promising response to this limitation is using data-driven surveys that integrate participants' online account data (e.g., Fitbit). In this paper, we evaluate using data-driven surveys for fitness-tracking research by examining how participants perceive them, how participants' self-reported data compares to their Fitbit data, and what monetary incentives could motivate participation. To this end, we integrated the participants' Fitbit data in a survey and conducted a three-group study with N = 300 participants. We discuss the two main findings: First, although participants were receptive to data-driven surveys, the groups that had to share their data had lower completion rates. Second, there was a large discrepancy between the self-reported data and the data in the participants' Fitbit accounts (e.g., only 38% self-reported a consistent typical weekly exercise-time). We provide suggestions for researchers who conduct online surveys, including data-driven ones, that collect online-account data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velykoivanenko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: