Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis shows mobile health significantly improves ART adherence and clinical outcomes among people living with HIV in resource-limited settings.
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is essential for HIV treatment, yet maintaining high adherence remains challenging in resource-limited settings. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions offer a scalable approach to support adherence. This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in improving ART adherence and clinical outcomes among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in low- and middle-income countries. Eight databases were searched through February 2025, and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating mHealth interventions were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and random-effects models were applied. Seventeen RCTs (n = 2172) met the inclusion criteria. mHealth interventions significantly improved ART adherence compared with standard or alternative approaches (OR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.44-2.86; p<0.0001). Subgroup analyses indicated moderating effects of geographic region (χ² = 8.84, p = 0.01) and country income level (χ² = 6.44, p = 0.04), with the greatest adherence benefits observed in the Americas (OR = 5.46; 95% CI: 2.20-13.57) and in upper-middle-income countries (OR = 3.45; 95% CI: 1.69-7.06). mHealth interventions also improved viral suppression (OR = 2.27; 95% CI: 1.18-4.36). Although CD4 count improvements were noted, sensitivity analysis suggested this effect was not robust. Overall, mHealth interventions show promise for strengthening ART adherence in resource-limited settings, while further research should explore contextual factors influencing effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: