Focus group discussions reveal challenges in medical decision-making for patients with migration backgrounds, highlighting language barriers and cultural preferences.
OP 12: Health Services 4, B210 (FCSH), September 3, 2025, 17:00 - 18:00 Aim This study aims to broadly explore the preferences and challenges regarding medical decision-making (MDM) among patients with a migration background in Belgium, from the perspectives of patients and general practitioners (GPs). According to existing literature, MDM involving patients with a migration background may be complicated not only by general challenges arising in intercultural health communication, but also by specific cultural preferences concerning patient autonomy. Methods Data were collected through five focus group discussions (FGDs), organised in November and December 2023. Three FGDs involved patients from the major non-EU migrant population groups in Belgium (Moroccan (n = 6), Turkish (n = 6), and sub-Saharan African (n = 7)), and two FGDs involved GPs (n = 13). The data were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Results Our results show that preferences and challenges revolved around four key components of MDM: Exchange of medical information, decision-making agency, patient-provider relationship, and treatment plan. Preferences and challenges were shaped by a complex interplay of factors at the individual (e.g., patient education, provider attitudes), interpersonal (e.g., family dynamics, language barriers), institutional (e.g., legal framework, medical education), and cultural levels (e.g., religion, health beliefs). Conclusion Our study highlights the importance of adopting an intersectional and multilayered perspective on MDM, which considers how various factors interact and shape preferences and challenges in MDM, depending on the individual and their context. Although it is impossible for GPs to be aware of every cultural preference, this study shows how GPs can engage in more culturally sensitive interactions with their patients. By also addressing the institutional factors that contribute to challenges in MDM, this approach can improve person-centred care by better accommodating each patient’s unique needs and preferences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yakhlaf et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: