Qualitative analysis reveals insights on contraception usage and perceptions in Roma women, suggesting cultural norms affect access and autonomy.
PTH 8: Miscellaneous 1, B304 (FCSH), September 5, 2025, 11:30 - 12:30 Background Research from other European countries shows that they have less knowledge of and use less modern contraception than their majority counterparts. Visiting Roma women are a marginalized minority in Norway and must navigate norms and expectations from their families and cultures as well as the Norwegian community and health care system. Roma women visiting Oslo undergo more induced abortions than the general population in Norway. No studies on use or attitudes towards contraception has previously been conducted in Norway. The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of how Roma women experience and perceive contraception. Method The study used a qualitative approach. Seven semi-structured interviews and one focus group discussion with five participants were conducted over two months, using a Romanian translator. In total, 12 women participated in the study. Participants were asked about their knowledge, experience of and thoughts on contraception. The interviews were analysed through the reflexive thematic analysis by Braun and Clark. Results The results were divided into the following themes, through the analytic process: 1. Evolving access to knowledge and information about contraception 2. Navigating fertility and autonomy: Perceived relevance of modern contraception 3. Adapting to limited options, and 4. Whispering female fellowship: Exchange of information and conversations on contraception. Conclusion The study indicates a paradox in the group’s perception of contraception. For many, contraception was seen as something positive but not experienced as relevant. The study highlights the importance of considering the sense of relevance and intersectional experiences in one’s life in further research and initiatives to promote the use of contraception.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Einang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: