Analysis reveals significant gaps in medical interpreting for refugees, highlighting advocacy for equitable access.
WKS 20:, Implementing the Right to Interpretation in Healthcare: Challenges and Successful Strategies for Policymakers, Practitioners and Patients, B203 (FCSH), September 4, 2025, 14:45 - 15:45 Language barriers pose significant challenges to delivering quality refugee healthcare, and conveying effective preventive and public health information. A recent study in Canada showed that there were significant gaps and disparities accessing medical interpreting services. General access to medical interpreting is both a moral imperative and a prudent investment. In Canada, as most countries in the Global North, however there is an absence of a cohesive national strategy, reflected in diverse funding models employed across provinces. Goals To review experiences in North America and Europe with access to medical interpretation To discuss advocacy strategies for medical interpretation relevant to each context For the first half hour-drawing from a recent article https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/5/588 we will discuss the variation across Canadian provinces, human rights principles and ethical considerations including rights to healthcare and non-discrimination within the system, rights not to be harmed and to informed consent/refusal of individuals. and explain how medical interpreting enhances healthcare quality, preserves patient autonomy and builds trust along with decision-making processes for utilizing interpreting services and some digital strategies; For the second third we’ll discuss the European context drawing on experiences of participants. If the audience is large we can break into two or three groups. For the final third we can discuss policy changes required and how to implement them sharing experiences of all. We will share a useful framework for advocating for interpretation as a human right. We hope to develop recommendations at provider, organizational and system levels to ensure equitable access to promote the health and well-being of refugees in North American and European contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: