BACKGROUND Surface electromyography (sEMG) of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) offers insights into neuromuscular control but lacks standardized normative values. This study aimed to evaluate baseline and contractile sEMG signal characteristics - including root mean square (RMS) amplitude in microvolts and normalized to maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC) - in a healthy control (H) group, pelvic floor dyssynergia (DS) group, and urinary incontinence (UI) group. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis included 68 women (H=28, UI=22, DS=18). UI was confirmed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and DS diagnosed via anorectal manometry. sEMG was recorded with a intravaginal probe using the Glazer protocol. RMS and %MVC were analyzed using Bayesian multivariate regression adjusted for age and BMI. RESULTS No significant differences were found at baseline rest or rapid contractions (P>0.05). The DS group showed higher RMS during tonic contractions vs H group (Δ=4.20, 95% BCI [0.99, 7.29], P<0.05) and UI (Δ=3.44, 95% BCI [0.48, 6.20], P<0.05), and impaired post-tonic relaxation vs H group (Δ=1.13, 95% BCI [0.10, 2.15], P<0.05). Normalized to %MVC, DS group showed lower rapid contraction activity than H group (Δ=-10.49, 95% BCI [-19.46, -1.86], P<0.05). H group outperformed UI group in tonic contraction (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS DS showed higher RMS amplitudes during tonic contractions, impaired relaxation, and reduced %MVC efficiency, indicating paradoxical activity. UI patterns were heterogeneous, highlighting its multifactorial nature. Reliance on raw RMS alone may misclassify dysfunctions; multiparametric assessment and validation in larger cohorts are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasper‐Jędrzejewska et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: