Cross-sectional study demonstrates impaired pelvic floor muscle activation in adults with intellectual disability, indicating a neuromuscular basis for incontinence.
Introduction Adults with intellectual disability (ID) have high rates of urinary incontinence, yet objective neuromuscular data are limited. We compared pelvic floor muscle (PFM) activation using surface electromyography (sEMG) in adults with ID versus matched controls. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, 104 participants were recruited to an ID group ( n = 52) and a matched control group ( n = 52). Perianal sEMG recorded five maximal voluntary contractions following a standardised protocol. Intensity, variability, contraction onset and relaxation times were analysed using t or Mann–Whitney tests, MANOVA and multiple regression. Results Compared with controls, the ID group showed lower mean activity (5.3 ± 6.0 vs. 8.8 ± 7.2 μV; p < 0.001; d = 0.52), lower peaks, longer onset and greater variability; relaxation parameters did not differ. MANOVA indicated a significant global group effect (Wilks' λ = 0.801, p = 0.003). Regression identified ID as the sole independent predictor of reduced activation. Conclusions Adults with ID exhibit weaker, less stable and delayed PFM activation, supporting tailored physiotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López‐Lezcano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: