Purpose: The aim was to compare the short-term outcomes of aflibercept 8 mg and brolucizumab for the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: This study included 48 eyes of 48 patients with PCV. Drug selection was based on the treatment period. Sixteen eyes received aflibercept 8 mg and thirty-two eyes received brolucizumab. All eyes underwent three consecutive monthly injections: aflibercept (114.3 mg/mL; 0.07 mL) or brolucizumab (120 mg/mL; 0.05 mL). Indocyanine green angiography was performed at baseline and at the 3-month visit to confirm the presence of polypoidal lesions. Results: In the aflibercept 8 mg group, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved from 0.28 ± 0.26 at baseline to 0.18 ± 0.25 at the 3-month visit (p < 0.001). In the brolucizumab 6 mg group, BCVA improved from 0.35 ± 0.26 to 0.29 ± 0.27, although the change was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). Multivariate regression analysis showed that better BCVA at 3 months was associated with better baseline BCVA and lower central retinal thickness (CRT), independent of the drug used. CRT decreased from 382 ± 157 to 198 ± 98 in the brolucizumab 6 mg group and from 358 ± 152 to 192 ± 76 in the aflibercept 8 mg group at 3 months. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) decreased from 201 ± 78 to 167 ± 60 in the brolucizumab 6 mg group and from 186 ± 76 to 153 ± 67 in the aflibercept 8 mg group. The dry macula rate at 3 months was the same for aflibercept 8 mg and brolucizumab 6 mg at 93.8%. Complete regression of polypoidal lesions was observed in 62.5% and 75.0% of patients in the aflibercept and brolucizumab groups, respectively (p = 0.57). Conclusions: During the induction phase, aflibercept 8 mg demonstrated comparable outcomes to brolucizumab 6 mg in reducing CRT and SCT, achieving a dry macula, improving BCVA, and regressing polypoidal lesions in eyes with PCV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukuda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: