Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To compare short-term anatomical and functional outcomes of intravitreal brolucizumab versus aflibercept in treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with thick pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs). Methods: This retrospective comparative study included treatment-naïve nAMD eyes with thick PEDs (maximum PED height ≥250 μm) treated with intravitreal aflibercept or brolucizumab between January 2022 and June 2025, with a minimum 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome was anatomical response at Month 6, defined as ≥50% reduction in maximum PED height. Secondary outcomes included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), qualitative OCT features, injection burden, and safety. Longitudinal changes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results: Forty-one eyes (aflibercept, n=21; brolucizumab, n=20) were included. Baseline BCVA, CFT, and PED height did not differ significantly between the groups, although SFCT was thicker in the brolucizumab group (P=0.034). Over 6 months, the mean number of injections was significantly lower with brolucizumab (3.05 ± 0.40 vs. 3.86 ± 0.65, P<0.001). Brolucizumab achieved greater reduction in PED height at Month 3 (P=0.014) and Month 6 (P=0.044). In mixed-effects analysis, all anatomical parameters and BCVA improved over time (Ptime<0.001). SFCT demonstrated significant group and interaction effects (Pgroup=0.031; Pint=0.006), whereas PED height and CFT did not. Residual subretinal hyperreflective material was less frequent at Month 3 with brolucizumab (0.0% vs. 23.8%, P=0.048). No intraocular inflammation occurred. Conclusions: In treatment-naïve nAMD eyes with thick PEDs, brolucizumab was associated with greater short-term anatomical improvement and a lower injection burden compared with aflibercept, whereas no statistically significant between-group difference was observed in BCVA change. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: