The current generation of cryogenic solid state detectors used in direct dark matter and <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>CE</a:mi> <a:mi>ν</a:mi> <a:mi>NS</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:math> searches typically reach energy thresholds of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mrow> <c:mi mathvariant="script">O</c:mi> <c:mo stretchy="false">(</c:mo> <c:mn>10</c:mn> <c:mo stretchy="false">)</c:mo> <c:mtext> </c:mtext> <c:mtext> </c:mtext> <c:mi>eV</c:mi> </c:mrow> </c:math> for nuclear recoils. For a reliable calibration in this energy regime a method has been proposed, providing monoenergetic nuclear recoils at low energies <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <h:mrow> <h:mo>∼</h:mo> <h:mn>100</h:mn> <h:mtext> </h:mtext> <h:mi>eV</h:mi> <h:mi>–</h:mi> <h:mn>1</h:mn> <h:mtext> </h:mtext> <h:mtext> </h:mtext> <h:mi>keV</h:mi> </h:mrow> </h:math> . In this work we report on the observation of a peak at ( <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <j:msubsup> <j:mn>1113.6</j:mn> <j:mrow> <j:mo>−</j:mo> <j:mn>6.5</j:mn> </j:mrow> <j:mrow> <j:mo>+</j:mo> <j:mn>6.5</j:mn> </j:mrow> </j:msubsup> </j:math> ) <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <l:mi>eV</l:mi> </l:math> in the data of an <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <n:msub> <n:mtext>Al</n:mtext> <n:mn>2</n:mn> </n:msub> <n:msub> <n:mi mathvariant="normal">O</n:mi> <n:mn>3</n:mn> </n:msub> </n:math> crystal in CRESST-III, which was irradiated with neutrons from an AmBe calibration source. We attribute this monoenergetic peak to the radiative capture of thermal neutrons on <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <q:mrow> <q:mmultiscripts> <q:mrow> <q:mi>Al</q:mi> </q:mrow> <q:mprescripts/> <q:none/> <q:mrow> <q:mn>27</q:mn> </q:mrow> </q:mmultiscripts> </q:mrow> </q:math> and the subsequent deexcitation via single <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <s:mi>γ</s:mi> </s:math> emission. We compare the measured results with the outcome of Geant4 simulations and investigate the possibility to make use of this effect for the energy calibration of <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <u:msub> <u:mtext>Al</u:mtext> <u:mn>2</u:mn> </u:msub> <u:msub> <u:mi mathvariant="normal">O</u:mi> <u:mn>3</u:mn> </u:msub> </u:math> detectors at low energies. We further investigate the possibility of a shift in the expected energy scale of this effect caused by the creation of defects in the target crystal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angloher et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: