This study examines how Israel’s legal and institutional arrangements, including migration policies, health-insurance eligibility rules, and safety enforcement mechanisms, shape health risks for Thai migrant agricultural workers, and identifies policy levers to mitigate preventable harm. Using a legal policy analysis informed by syndemics and labor frameworks, we mapped laws, regulatory oversight, and enforcement chains, and synthesized evidence from worker surveys, affidavits, and civil society reports to link institutional structures with barriers experienced in workplaces and healthcare settings. The findings reveal that health inequalities stem from structural design rather than isolated failures, including exclusion from public insurance, dependence on employer-based plans, employer-tied visas, opaque injury-claim procedures, fragmented oversight, absence of occupational-health surveillance, limited language access, poor housing conditions, and weak inspections. These interlocking features reinforce one another, resulting in under-reporting, delayed medical attention, and cumulative physical and psychological harm. The study concludes that structural legal and administrative reforms—rather than individual adaptation—are required to address these inequities. Policy priorities include integrating migrant workers into public insurance or ensuring equivalent coverage, decoupling residency from single employers, guaranteeing multilingual access, establishing independent health monitoring, and enforcing safety, housing standards and other social determinants of health through transparent inspections, positive incentives and meaningful sanctions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurlander et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: