Biomolecules have gained attention in recent years for their potential to enhance regenerative periodontal therapy. This study compared hyaluronic acid (HA) and enamel matrix derivative (EMD), each combined with a xenogeneic graft, in adults with periodontitis presenting vertical bone loss with an intrabony component ≥3 mm. Seventeen participants contributed 28 defects, assigned in equal numbers to Bio-Oss Collagen® plus HA gel (hyaDENT BG®) or Bio-Oss Collagen® plus EMD (Emdogain®). Outcomes included reduction in probing pocket depth (PPD), gain in clinical attachment level (CAL), and radiographic measures of residual defect and bone fill, assessed at baseline and 6 months after the surgery. Both approaches produced significant within-group improvements in PPD, CAL, and radiographic bone fill (all p = 0.001). Postoperative values and mean changes did not differ significantly between groups (all p > 0.24). Within the limitations of this small, non-randomized study, the findings indicate that HA gel can achieve clinical and radiographic outcomes comparable to EMD when both are used with a xenogeneic scaffold. These results should be considered preliminary, suggesting that HA may represent a practical and biologically compatible alternative to EMD, particularly in cases where cost, availability, or religious considerations limit its use. Confirmation through larger, randomized, and long-term studies is warranted to validate these observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dosseva-Panova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: