PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1993Clinical Infectious Diseases4,368 citations

1993 Revised Classification System for HIV Infection and Expanded Surveillance Case Definition for AIDS Among Adolescents and Adults

View Full Paper
KCK. G. CastroJWJill WardLSLaurence Slutsker

Key Points

  • Update the classification system for HIV infection and expand the national AIDS surveillance case definition in adolescents and adults to emphasize CD4+ T-lymphocyte monitoring.
  • Integrated absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts (<200 cells/µL) and CD4+ percentages (<14%) into clinical staging categories to replace the 1986 framework.
  • Added three clinical conditions—pulmonary tuberculosis, recurrent pneumonia, and invasive cervical cancer—while retaining the 23 clinical indicator conditions established in 1987.
  • Mandated the updated AIDS surveillance definition for nationwide case reporting across all US states effective January 1, 1993.
  • Expanded AIDS case criteria to include all HIV-infected individuals with severe CD4+ T-lymphocyte depletion (<200 cells/µL or <14%), regardless of secondary clinical diagnoses.

Abstract

CDC has revised the classification system for HIV infection to emphasize the clinical importance of the CD4+ T-lymphocyte count in the categorization of HIV-related clinical conditions. This classification system replaces the system published by CDC in 1986 1 and is primarily intended for use in public health practice. Consistent with the 1993 revised classification system, CDC has also expanded the AIDS surveillance case definition to include all HIV-infected persons who have <200 CD4+ T-lymphocytes/µL, or a CD4+ T-lymphocyte percentage of total lymphocytes of <14. This expansion includes the addition of three clinical conditions—pulmonary tuberculosis, recurrent pneumonia, and invasive cervical cancer—and retains the 23 clinical conditions in the AIDS surveillance case definition published in 1987 2; it is to be used by all states for AIDS case reporting effective January 1, 1993.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Castro et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69437741b84345e3eab32e8fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/17.4.802
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Primary HIV infection: host responses and intervention strategies.1991 · 249 citations
  2. 2Racial and Ethnic Differences in Outcome in Zidovudine-Treated Patients With Advanced HIV Disease1991 · 93 citations
  3. 3ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME (AIDS)-FREE TIME AFTER HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS TYPE 1 (HIV-1) SEROCONVERSION IN HOMOSEXUAL MEN1989 · 209 citations
  4. 4Human immunodeficiency virus infection and cervical neoplasia1990 · 292 citations
  5. 5Markers for progression in HIV infection1989 · 76 citations