Abstract The article explores the paradox of toxicity within the digital self-care movement, where attempts at promoting well-being and mental health can foster anxiety, self-comparison, and alienation. The virtual landscape, driven by aesthetic standards and consumerist pressures, transforms self-care into an arena of self-surveillance, digital narcissism, and exclusion, which paradoxically undermines the genuine, introspective, and restorative goals of self-care itself. Using a framework that combines aesthetics and ethics, this article will examine the ‘toxic self-care paradox’ in the context of late-stage capitalism. First, it investigates the ‘aesthetic toxicity’ of the self-care industry complex, showing how carefully constructed standards of beauty and health lead to cycles of consumer discontent, aesthetic anxiety, and exclusionary norms. Second, it examines the ‘toxicity of self-optimization,’ which turns caring into a moral duty linked to output, self-control, and public performance. Lastly, the article challenges prevailing neoliberal wellness paradigms and opens up more inclusive, collective possibilities for well-being by putting out an alternative vision of self-care based on structural awareness, emotional resilience, and ethical refusal.
Puja Raj (Tue,) studied this question.