The framework reveals subtle new physics signals in particle physics, suggesting that alternative hypotheses may explain deviations in data.
In particle physics and cosmology, distinguishing subtle new physics signals from established backgrounds is always a fundamental challenge for individual phenomenologists. This paper presents a simple and robust statistical framework to evaluate the compatibility of highly motivated (HM) theoretical models with the residual of the experimental results, focusing on scenarios where data appears consistent with background predictions. We develop a likelihood ratio test procedure that compares null and alternative hypotheses, emphasizing cases where new physics introduces small deviations from the background. We demonstrate the approach through two concrete examples, a localized excess and a modulation over an oscillatory background. We derive explicit conditions under which the effect of the background on the residual of the data must be accounted for. The framework's practicality is highlighted and in addition to the limitation, strategies to simplify complex background modeling are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. Ansarifard (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: