Qualitative research reveals that therapeutic design, including spatial organization and ventilation, impacts outcomes in drug rehabilitation facilities.
Drug addiction remains a pressing global health challenge, with serious implications for public health, social stability, and economic development. In Nigeria, and particularly in Kano State, the rising prevalence of substance abuse such as tramadol, codeine, and cannabis underscores the urgent need for effective rehabilitation facilities. This study examines the application of therapeutic design strategies to optimize healing in drug rehabilitation centers in Kano. A qualitative research approach was employed; utilizing case studies of three rehabilitation centers Amana Sanatorium, Kano State Rehabilitation Center, and Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital Rehabilitation Ward, these case studies were complimented by interviews and structured observations. Findings from the three case studies revealed significant variability in the integration of therapeutic strategies; Amana Sanatorium achieved moderate efficiency in natural exposure but lacked recreational and therapy facilities. Kano State Rehabilitation Center scored lowest across all variables, reflecting systemic neglect of healing design and Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital Rehabilitation ward performed relatively better, particularly in exposure to nature and use of open spaces, though it also lacked structured therapy provisions. Furthermore, it has been observed that most facilities lack essential therapeutic design features, such as natural lighting, ventilation, color therapy, open spaces, and recreational provisions, which are crucial for fostering healing environments. The study identifies natural elements, spatial organization, and sensory design strategies as key contributors to improved recovery outcomes. These insights provide practical recommendations for architects, healthcare planners, and policymakers in Nigeria to integrate therapeutic principles into future rehabilitation projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: