PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2016Journal of Applied Physiology408 citationsOpen Access

A machine-learning approach for computation of fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomography

View Full Paper
LILucian ItuSRSaikiran RapakaTPTiziano Passerini

Key Points

  • Develop and validate a machine-learning framework to rapidly predict fractional flow reserve (FFR) along coronary arteries from computed tomography scans as an alternative to computationally heavy physics-based models.
  • Trained a machine-learning model on synthetic coronary anatomies using target values derived from physics-based computational fluid dynamics simulations.
  • Assessed model performance against physics-based computations and invasive catheter-measured FFR across 87 patients with 125 total coronary lesions.
  • Demonstrated near-perfect correlation with physics-based simulations (r = 0.9994, P < 0.001) and no systematic bias on Bland-Altman analysis (mean difference: -0.00081 ± 0.0039).
  • Identified invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 (present in 38 of 125 lesions) with 81.6% sensitivity, 83.9% specificity, 83.2% accuracy, and a correlation of r = 0.729 (P < 0.001).
  • Reduced average execution time by more than 80-fold compared to computational fluid dynamics models (2.4 ± 0.44 s vs. 196.3 ± 78.5 s).

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a functional index quantifying the severity of coronary artery lesions and is clinically obtained using an invasive, catheter-based measurement. Recently, physics-based models have shown great promise in being able to noninvasively estimate FFR from patient-specific anatomical information, e.g., obtained from computed tomography scans of the heart and the coronary arteries. However, these models have high computational demand, limiting their clinical adoption. In this paper, we present a machine-learning-based model for predicting FFR as an alternative to physics-based approaches. The model is trained on a large database of synthetically generated coronary anatomies, where the target values are computed using the physics-based model. The trained model predicts FFR at each point along the centerline of the coronary tree, and its performance was assessed by comparing the predictions against physics-based computations and against invasively measured FFR for 87 patients and 125 lesions in total. Correlation between machine-learning and physics-based predictions was excellent (0.9994, P < 0.001), and no systematic bias was found in Bland-Altman analysis: mean difference was -0.00081 ± 0.0039. Invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 was found in 38 lesions out of 125 and was predicted by the machine-learning algorithm with a sensitivity of 81.6%, a specificity of 83.9%, and an accuracy of 83.2%. The correlation was 0.729 (P < 0.001). Compared with the physics-based computation, average execution time was reduced by more than 80 times, leading to near real-time assessment of FFR. Average execution time went down from 196.3 ± 78.5 s for the CFD model to ∼2.4 ± 0.44 s for the machine-learning model on a workstation with 3.4-GHz Intel i7 8-core processor.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Itu et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695abd791fb4b9a2406fa7eehttps://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00752.2015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper