Despite ongoing advances in maritime safety research, ship accidents persist, with significant consequences for human life, marine ecosystems, and port operations. Because many accidents occur in or near ports, assessing a vessel’s ability to enter or depart safely remains critical. Although ports apply local navigational rules, safety criteria could be strengthened by adopting more adaptive and data-informed approaches. This study presents a mathematical framework that links Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to a Ship Risk Profile (SRP) for collision/contact/grounding risk indication. Expert-based KPI importance weights were derived using the Average Rank Transformation into Weight method in linear (ARTIW-L) and nonlinear (ARTIW-N) forms and aggregated into a nominal SRP. Using routinely monitored KPIs largely drawn from the Baltic and International Maritime Council and Port State Control/flag-related measures, the results indicate that critical equipment and systems failures and human/organisational factors—particularly occupational health and safety and human resource management deficiencies—are the most influential contributors to the normalised accident-risk index. The proposed framework provides port authorities and maritime stakeholders with an interpretable basis for more proactive risk-informed decision-making and targeted safety improvements.
Markauskas et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: