Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multi-messenger observations reveal improved Hubble constant constraints in cosmology, highlighting dark energy insights.
In the third-generation (3G) gravitational-wave (GW) detector era, GW multi-messenger observations for binary neutron star merger events can exert significant effects on exploring the cosmic expansion history. Extending a previous work, we explore the potential of 3G GW standard siren observations in cosmological parameter estimation by considering their associated electromagnetic (EM) counterparts, including γ γ -ray burst (GRB) coincidence observations by the Gravitational Wave High-energy Electromagnetic Counterpart All-sky Monitor and GW-triggered target-of-opportunity observations of kilonovae by different optical survey projects. During an assumed 10-year observation, we predict that the number of detectable GW-kilonova events is ~ 4900 ∼ 4900 with redshifts below ~ 0.4 ∼ 0.4 under the GW detector network and Large Synoptic Survey Telescope in the i band, which is more than three times that of GW-GRB detections. For the cosmological analysis, we find that with the inclusion of GW-kilonova detections, the constraints on cosmological parameters from GW-EM detections are significantly improved compared to those from GW-GRB detections. In particular, GW-EM detections can tightly constrain the Hubble constant with precision ranging from $$0.076%$$ 0.076 % to $$0.034%$$ 0.034 % . Moreover, GW multi-messenger observations can effectively break the cosmological parameter degeneracies generated by the typical EM observations, CMB+BAO+SN (CBS). The combination of CBS and GW-EM can tightly constrain the equation-of-state parameters of dark energy w in the w CDM model and w₀ w 0 in the w₀wₐ w 0 w a CDM model with precision of $$0.72%$$ 0.72 % and $$0.99%$$ 0.99 % , respectively, meeting the standard of precision cosmology. In conclusion, GW multi-messenger observations could play a crucial role in helping solve the Hubble tension and probing the fundamental nature of dark energy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: