Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article analyzes the Netherlands Model BIT's impact on corporate social responsibility in investment arbitration, revealing existing gaps in protection.
Ten years ago, the European Commission proposed to build a new ‘model’ of international investment protection that would not only protect foreign investment but also non-economic values, such as environmental stewardship, public health, and human rights. In the context of the ongoing EU reform of international investment law, the ‘new-generation’ Netherlands Model BIT (2019) has been praised for championing foreign investors’ Corporate Social Responsibility (‘CSR’). This article investigates whether this innovative model may be regarded as a ‘trailblazer’ in CSR reform. It argues that, despite its cutting-edge provisions, gaps remain in CSR protection. Before turning to this analysis, the first section examines – as a necessary preliminary step – the broader issue of the interplay between CSR and international investment arbitration. The second section provides an in-depth analysis of the legal treatment of CSR under the Netherlands Model BIT (2019) and compares it with other reform initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noah Barr (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: