Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-methods design reveals training improves whistleblowing in Qatar's banking sector, indicating trust and transparency are crucial.
Whistleblowing is a key mechanism of financial governance; however, its effectiveness varies across institutional and cultural contexts. This study examines the factors influencing whistleblowing effectiveness in Qatar’s banking sector, employing an integrated model grounded in the Stimulus–Organism–Response framework and Prosocial Behavior theory. A mixed-methods design combined survey data from 354 banking employees with qualitative text analysis. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) revealed that Training and awareness were the strongest predictors of whistleblowing effectiveness, followed by Transparency and Accountability, and Reporting and Monitoring Mechanisms. At the same time, Legislative and Policy Framework were not significant. Fear of Retaliation partially mediated these relationships, underscoring the importance of psychological safety and trust. Thematic analysis confirmed these findings, highlighting leadership credibility, anonymity, and independent reporting as key enablers, while cultural norms such as hierarchy and loyalty remained barriers. The results indicate that effective whistleblowing in Qatar is less dependent on formal regulation and more on cultivating trust, transparency, and credible protection mechanisms. The study extends behavioral theory to financial ethics, offering practical insights for strengthening integrity systems in emerging financial sectors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Thani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: