PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 6, 2026Sustainability3 citationsOpen Access

A Hierarchical Spatio-Temporal Framework for Sustainable and Equitable EV Charging Station Location Optimization: A Case Study of Wuhan

View Full Paper
YHYanyan HuangHRHangyi RenZLZehua Liu

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop an integrated framework for optimizing EV charging station locations in an equitable and sustainable manner.
  • Developed a grid-based planning framework for Wuhan
  • Utilized attention-enhanced ConvLSTM for demand forecasting
  • Created a rank-based accessibility index for equitable network expansion
  • Formulated optimization problem using NSGA-II for site selection
  • Implemented TOPSIS for practical deployment plans
  • Validated a method for identifying underserved areas in the city
  • Showed that demand forecasting improved equitable service coverage
  • Highlighted the tension between coverage and equity in site selection strategies

Abstract

Deploying public EV charging infrastructure while balancing efficiency, equity, and implementation feasibility remains a key challenge for sustainable urban mobility. This study develops an integrated, grid-based planning framework for Wuhan that combines attention-enhanced ConvLSTM demand forecasting with a trajectory-derived, rank-based accessibility index to support equitable network expansion. Using large-scale charging-platform status observations and citywide ride-hailing mobility traces, we generate grid-level demand surfaces and an accessibility layer that helps reveal structurally connected yet underserved areas, including demand-sparse zones that may be overlooked by utilization-only planning. We screen feasible grid cells to construct a new-station candidate set and formulate expansion as a constrained three-objective optimization problem solved by NSGA-II: maximizing demand-weighted neighborhood service coverage, minimizing the Group Parity Gap between low-accessibility populations and the citywide population, and minimizing grid-connection friction proxied by road-network distance to the nearest power substation. Practical deployment plans for 15 and 30 sites are selected from the Pareto set using TOPSIS under an explicit weighting scheme. Benchmarking against random selection and single-objective greedy baselines under identical candidate pools, constraints, and evaluation metrics demonstrates a persistent coverage–equity–cost tension: coverage-driven heuristics improve demand capture but worsen parity, whereas equity-prioritizing strategies reduce gaps at the expense of coverage and feasibility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/695d856e3483e917927a505bhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18010497
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper