Key result
Multi-omics may enable precision therapies tailored to HFpEF endophenotypes by addressing traditional diagnostic limitations.
Why the study?
Disease-modifying therapies for HFpEF remain limited due to clinical heterogeneity and overlapping endophenotypes that conventional metrics incompletely capture.
Design
Narrative review
Extends multi-omics framework for HFpEF endophenotypes; leaves open clinical translation pending prospective validation.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for about half of heart failure cases and is linked to aging, obesity, diabetes, and multimorbidity, yet disease-modifying therapies remain limited. A major barrier is heterogeneity: HFpEF comprises overlapping inflammatory, fibrotic, cardiometabolic, and hemodynamic/vascular endophenotypes embedded within systemic cardiorenal and cardiohepatic cross-talk, which conventional metrics such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), natriuretic peptides (NPs), and standard imaging capture incompletely. In this narrative review, we synthesize clinical, mechanistic, and trial data to describe HFpEF endophenotypes and their multi-organ interactions; critically appraise why traditional diagnostic and enrollment strategies contributed to neutral outcomes in landmark trials; and survey emerging cardiovascular multi-omics studies. We then outline an integrative systems-biology framework that applies (i) within-layer analyses and cross-layer integration, (ii) network-based driver nomination and biomarker discovery, and (iii) target nomination to link molecular programs with circulating markers and candidate therapies. Finally, we discuss practical challenges in implementing multi-omics HFpEF research and highlight future directions such as artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled multi-omics integration, cross-organ profiling, and biomarker-guided, endotype-enriched platform trials. Collectively, these advances position HFpEF as a proving ground for precision cardiology, in which therapies are matched to molecularly defined disease programs rather than ejection-fraction cutoffs alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question. Multi-omics approaches may enable precision therapies tailored to HFpEF endophenotypes, addressing the limitations of traditional diagnostic metrics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: