Key result
Digital HF diagnostic pathways may generate incremental benefit at ~£5,900 per QALY gained versus standard care.
Why the study?
Early heart failure diagnosis improves outcomes, but diagnosis is complex and often delayed, and digital pathways may improve on standard pathways.
Does a digital diagnostic pathway improve cost-effectiveness in people with suspected heart failure and elevated NT-proBNP?
Does a digital diagnostic pathway improve cost-effectiveness in people with suspected heart failure and elevated NT-proBNP?
A modelled digital diagnostic pathway for suspected heart failure is potentially cost-effective in the UK, with an incremental cost per QALY of £5,882.
May support digital HF diagnostic pathways in UK models; leaves open prospective validation before adoption.
Guidelines recommend prompt diagnosis of suspected heart failure in people with elevated N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Early diagnosis of heart failure improves patient outcomes, however diagnosis is complex and can often be delayed. Digital platforms can provide clinicians with greater access to information with which to diagnose heart failure, improving on standard diagnostic pathways. We modelled the potential cost-effectiveness of a digital pathway, adapting the UK NICE guideline (NG106) cost-effectiveness model to evaluate the impact of potentially speedier diagnosis and treatment of heart failure. Posited reductions in time to treatment were modelled to reduce short-term mortality and generate approximately 0.056 incremental quality adjusted life-years over a lifetime horizon. Additional costs arose from earlier heart failure treatment, resulting in a cost per quality adjusted life-year of £5,882 (95% confidence interval £4,377 - £11,084).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McMeekin et al. (2026) studied this question. Implementing a digital diagnostic pathway for heart failure may generate 0.056 incremental quality adjusted life-years at a cost of £5,882 per QALY gained.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: