Key result
Initial antithrombotic regimens after LAAC show no impact on short-term clinical outcomes.
Why the study?
Do different antithrombotic regimens affect major adverse events in patients after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure?
Observational (n=1,449)
Yes
Do different antithrombotic regimens affect major adverse events in patients after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure?
In a Japanese real-world registry, variations in antithrombotic regimens after LAAC did not significantly impact major adverse events at 6 months.
Suggests short-term flexibility in post-LAAC antithrombotic selection may.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugiyama et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Left atrial appendage closure (n=1,449). Antithrombotic regimens vs. Other antithrombotic regimens was evaluated on Major adverse events at 6 months. Differences in antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure were not significantly associated with major adverse events at 6 months in a real-world registry of 1,449 Japanese patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: