Key result
HRV analysis reveals two distinct ultra-low frequency components regulated separately by circadian and ultradian rhythms.
Why the study?
The ultra-low frequency component of HRV is poorly understood, and recent research suggested its frequency distribution is bimodal.
Heart rate variability in the ultra-low frequency band can be decomposed into two independent components (ELF and nULF) regulated by circadian and ultradian rhythms, respectively.
Heart rate variability (HRV) comprises several components driven by various internal processes, the least understood of which is the ultra-low frequency (ULF) one. Recently published research has shown that the HRV frequency distribution in this range is bimodal. The main aims of this work were to verify this finding, to determine the basic characteristics of these two components and to analyze their potential physiological couplings. For this purpose, two components within the conventional ULF band (below 4 mHz) were extracted from HRVs of 25 patients with apnea using adaptive variational mode decomposition (AVMD) and continuous wavelet transform (CWT), and then analyzed with the Hilbert transform (HT), Savitzky–Golay filter, and empirical distributions of instantaneous amplitudes and frequencies. These studies have demonstrated the existence of both components in HRVs of all subjects and apnea groups: extremely low frequencies (ELFs) in the range of 0.01–0.4 mHz and narrowed ultra-low frequencies (nULFs) in the range of 0.1–4 mHz. The independence of both components is also shown. Concluding, heart rate variability is separately regulated by circadian rhythms (ELF bound) and ultradian fluctuations (nULF bound), which can be assessed by decomposing HRV, and the obtained components may be helpful to better understand the underlying homeostatic mechanisms, as well as in the long-term monitoring of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamczyk et al. (2025) studied this question. Heart rate variability analysis revealed two distinct components, ELFs (0.01–0.4 mHz) and nULFs (0.1–4 mHz), indicating separate regulation by circadian and ultradian rhythms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: