Why the study?
Heart rate variability provides insight into cardiovascular and autonomic nervous system functions, but classical spectral analysis is most often used, prompting the need for an online decomposition algorithm.
The newly developed online VMD algorithm effectively decomposes HRV into its four frequency components with quality comparable to offline methods, enabling real-time monitoring of cardiovascular and autonomic functions.
May enable real-time HRV monitoring; leaves open clinical validation before adoption.
Heart rate variability (HRV) containing four components of high (HF), low (LF), very low (VLF), and ultra-low (ULF) frequencies provides insight into the cardiovascular and autonomic nervous system functions. Classical spectral analysis is most often used in research on HRV and its components. The aim of this work was to develop and validate an online HRV decomposition algorithm for monitoring the associated physiological processes. The online algorithm was developed based on variational mode decomposition (VMD), validated on synthetic HRV with known properties and compared with its offline adaptive version AVMD, standard VMD, continuous wavelet transform (CWT), and wavelet package decomposition (WPD). Finally, it was used to decompose 36 real all-night HRVs from two datasets to analyze the properties of the four extracted components using the Hilbert transform. The statistical tests confirmed that the online VMD (VMDon) algorithm returned results of comparable quality to AVMD and CWT, and outperformed standard VMD and WPD. VMDon, AVMD, and CWT extracted four components from the real HRV with frequency content slightly exceeding the previously recognized ranges, suggesting the possibility of their modes mixing. Their ranges of variability were assessed as follows: HF: 0.11–0.40 Hz; LF: 0.029–0.14 Hz; VLF: 4.7–31 mHz; and ULF: 0.002–3.0 mHz.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamczyk et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: