Key result
CMR-modelled PCWP ≥15 mmHg is linked to ~111% higher risk of major events in NICM.
Why the study?
Invasive PCWP measurement is impractical for routine use, and whether a non-invasive CMR-modelled PCWP improves prognostic assessment beyond conventional markers in NICM is not well established.
Does elevated CMR-modelled PCWP (≥ 15 mmHg) predict adverse outcomes in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy?
Does elevated CMR-modelled PCWP (≥ 15 mmHg) predict adverse outcomes in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy?
CMR-modelled PCWP provides a non-invasive method to independently predict mortality, heart transplantation, and heart failure hospitalization in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Supports noninvasive risk stratification in NICM; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers comprehensive assessment of cardiomyopathy but lacks validated methods for estimating left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP), an important prognostic marker. Invasive pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) measurements remain a gold standard but are impractical for routine use due to procedural risks. A CMR-modelled PCWP model offers a non-invasive alternative, but its ability to improve prognostic assessment beyond conventional markers has not been well established. We evaluated the prognostic utility of CMR PCWP in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Methods NICM patients who underwent CMR between December 2008 and December 2017 were retrospectively included. CMR-modelled PCWP was calculated as: 6.1352 + (0.07204 × left atrial volume [LAV]) + (0.02256 × left ventricular mass [LVM]). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). Secondary outcomes included HHF and all-cause mortality separately. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models assessed prognostic value. Results A total of 458 patients (mean age 53.2 years, BMI 29.3 kg/m², LVEF 32.8% ± 11.1%) were followed for a median of 3.6 years. The primary outcome occurred in 39% with PCWP ≥ 15 mmHg versus 21% with PCWP < 15 mmHg (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.48–3.01; P-valute < 0.001). Conclusion CMR-modelled PCWP provides independent prognostic value providing further risk differentiation among patients traditionally classified as low-risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korkerdsup et al. (2025) studied this question. CMR-modelled PCWP ≥ 15 mmHg was associated with a 2.11-fold increased risk of adverse outcomes compared to PCWP < 15 mmHg in patients with NICM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: