Guideline-directed medical therapy improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 39% to 50-55% in a patient with chemotherapy-induced heart failure after 12 months.
Does guideline-directed medical therapy improve LVEF in a patient with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy?
Prompt initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy can reverse anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy and significantly improve left ventricular ejection fraction.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Cardiotoxicity, including chemotherapy-induced heart failure (HF), remains a significant and well-recognised complication in modern oncologic practice. As cancer therapies evolve, treatment-related comorbidities continue to pose persistent challenges to patient outcomes and long-term survivorship. Among these, cytostatic-induced cardiotoxicity is particularly concerning due to its multifactorial and complex pathophysiology, involving oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and direct myocardial injury. A comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms is essential for developing targeted preventive strategies and evidence-based therapeutic interventions. We report a case of a 41-year-old Caucasian female who developed chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy, or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), following treatment for right-sided breast cancer. Baseline echocardiogram showed normal biventricular function; however, her left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) declined to 39% following dual anthracycline-based chemotherapy, specifically doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, for breast cancer. The patient was subsequently managed with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). At six- and 12-month follow-up, her LVEF improved to 45% and 50-55%, respectively, demonstrating favourable cardiac recovery under optimised pharmacologic management.
Gul et al. (Wed,) reported a other. Guideline-directed medical therapy improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 39% to 50-55% in a patient with chemotherapy-induced heart failure after 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: