Key result
Generalized CFAE ablation plus PVI outperforms selective ablation, achieving ~50% AF freedom at one year.
Why the study?
Does selective CFAE ablation targeting continuous electric activity improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia compared to generalized CFAE ablation in patients with persistent or high-burden paroxysmal AF?
Does selective CFAE ablation targeting continuous electric activity improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia compared to generalized CFAE ablation in patients with persistent or high-burden paroxysmal AF?
Generalized CFAE ablation combined with PVI is more effective than selective CFAE ablation targeting continuous electric activity for preventing long-term arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent or high-burden paroxysmal AF.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports generalized CFAE ablation plus PVI over selective targeting in persistent AF; extends RCT evidence on ablation extent.
Background— This study compared generalized complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation versus a selective CFAE ablation strategy targeting areas of continuous electric activity. Methods and Results— Subjects with symptomatic, persistent/high-burden paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were enrolled at 6 centers (n=86) and randomized to 1 of 2 arms. For group I, all CFAE regions with an interval confidence level >7 were ablated followed by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). For group II, only CFAE sites with continuous electric activity were ablated followed by PVI. For PVI, all 4 PV antra were isolated with confirmed entrance block. Subjects were followed for 1 year with a visit, ECG, and 48-hour Holter every 3 months. Symptoms were confirmed by loop recording. The primary end point was freedom from arrhythmia >30 seconds at 1 year. For both group I and II, CFAE ablation prolonged AF cycle length (25±33 versus 23±33 ms; P =0.78) and resulted in similar rates of AF termination (37% versus 28%; P =0.42). Radiofrequency duration during CFAE ablation was significantly less in group II (23±20 versus 38±20 minutes; P =0.002). At 1-year follow-up, freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence was significantly higher in group I versus group II after 1 procedure (50% versus 28%; P =0.03). There were also significantly fewer repeat procedures in group I (13% versus 36%; P =0.021). Conclusions— Continuous electric activity ablation+PVI result in a similar incidence of acute AF termination with significantly less radiofrequency time. However, incidence of repeat procedures and long-term recurrence of AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia are significantly lower using generalized CFAE ablation+PVI. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00926783
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verma et al. (2014) studied this question. Generalized CFAE ablation plus PVI resulted in 50% freedom from AF recurrence after 1 year, significantly higher than 28% in selective CFAE ablation (P = 0.03).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: