Why the study?
Does pulmonary vein isolation plus CFAE ablation within low voltage zones improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence compared to PVI alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Population
50 patients with persistent AF
Comparison
PVI plus CFAE ablation in low voltage zones vs PVI only
Design
Randomized trial
Follow-up
1-year
Key result
PVI plus CFAE ablation did not significantly improve 1-year atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival compared to PVI alone (60.0% vs 40.0%, p=0.329), despite improving atrial fibrillation-free survival.
Authors
Loading...
PVI plus CFAE ablation does not improve atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival; challenges its addition in persistent AF and leaves open strategies to reduce atrial tachycardia recurrences.
RCT (n=50)
1:1 ratio, blocked randomization sequence
No
Does pulmonary vein isolation plus CFAE ablation within low voltage zones improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence compared to PVI alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 60% vs 40%
p-value: p=0.329
In patients with persistent AF, adding CFAE ablation within low-voltage zones to PVI improved 1-year AF-free survival but did not significantly improve overall atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival due to increased atrial tachycardia recurrences.
Hwang et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (n=50). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation vs. PVI only was evaluated on Freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 1-year follow-up without antiarrhythmic drugs (p=0.329). PVI plus CFAE ablation did not significantly improve 1-year atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival compared to PVI alone (60.0% vs 40.0%, p=0.329), despite improving atrial fibrillation-free survival.