Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This minireview explores how metal-support interactions improve CO2 reduction in single-atom catalysts, highlighting design strategies and efficiency.
Electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2RR) is a promising route to transform a major greenhouse gas into value-added fuels and chemicals. However, its deployment is still hindered by the sluggish activation of CO2, poor selectivity toward multielectron products, and competition with the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Single-atom catalysts (SACs) have emerged as powerful materials to address these challenges because they combine maximal metal utilization with well-defined coordination environments whose electronic structure can be precisely tuned through metal–support interactions. This minireview summarizes current understanding of how structural, electronic, and chemical features of SAC supports (e.g., porosity, heteroatom doping, vacancies, and surface functionalization) govern the adsorption and conversion of key CO2RR intermediates and thus control product distributions from CO to CH4, CH3OH and C2+ species. Particular emphasis is placed on selectivity descriptors (e.g., coordination number, d-band position, binding energies of *COOH and *OCHO) and on rational design strategies that exploit curvature, microenvironment engineering, and electronic metal–support interactions to direct the reaction along desired pathways. Representative SAC systems based primarily on N-doped carbons, complemented by selected examples on oxides and MXenes are discussed in terms of Faradaic efficiency (FE), current density and operational stability under practically relevant conditions. Finally, the review highlights remaining bottlenecks and outlines future directions, including operando spectroscopy and data-driven analysis of dynamic single-site ensembles, machine-learning-assisted DFT screening, scalable mechanochemical synthesis, and integration of SACs into industrially viable electrolyzers for carbon-neutral chemical production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mansilla-Roux et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: