Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This Cochrane Review evaluates outcomes of physiology-guided PCI versus angiography-guided PCI in individuals with coronary artery disease, highlighting implications for treatment efficiency.
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: Primary objectives To evaluate the benefits and harms of physiology-guided PCI compared to angiography-guided PCI for cardiovascular events in individuals with CCS and ACS. Secondary objectives To assess potential differences in the effectiveness and safety of physiology-guided PCI according to patient characteristics, including sex and age, from the perspective of equity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Higuchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: