Why the study?
The optimal choice between imaging-guided and physiology-guided PCI has been a subject of ongoing debate.
Does imaging-guided PCI reduce adverse cardiovascular events compared to physiology-guided PCI in patients with coronary artery disease?
Comparison
Imaging-guided vs physiology-guided PCI
Design
Meta-analysis
Follow-up
Mean 2.1 years
Authors
Loading...
Imaging guidance may reduce TVR versus physiology guidance for ICLs; supports RCTs to confirm and extend findings.
Does imaging-guided PCI reduce adverse cardiovascular events compared to physiology-guided PCI in patients with coronary artery disease?
Imaging-guided PCI may reduce the need for future target vessel revascularization compared to physiology-guided PCI, regardless of acute coronary syndrome presentation.
Improta et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: