Key result
Ultra-low power ECG processor detects abnormal cardiac rhythms with ~99% sensitivity.
Why the study?
There was a need for an ultra-low power ECG processor ASIC to support wearable or implantable devices for long-term health monitoring and real-time detection of abnormal cardiac rhythms.
A novel ultra-low power ECG processor ASIC using a ternary neural network demonstrates high accuracy in detecting 13 abnormal cardiac rhythms, offering potential for long-term wearable or implantable health monitoring.
This paper presents an ultra-low power electrocardiography (ECG) processor application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) for the real-time detection of abnormal cardiac rhythms (ACRs). The proposed ECG processor can support wearable or implantable ECG devices for long-term health monitoring. It adopts a derivative-based patient adaptive threshold approach to detect the R peaks in the PQRST complex of ECG signals. Two tiny machine learning classifiers are used for the accurate classification of ACRs. A 3-layer feed-forward ternary neural network (TNN) is designed, which classifies the QRS complex's shape, followed by the adaptive decision logics (DL). The proposed processor requires only 1 KB on-chip memory to store the parameters and ECG data required by the classifiers. The ECG processor has been implemented based on fully-customized near-threshold logic cells using thick-gate transistors in 65-nm CMOS technology. The ASIC core occupies a die area of 1.08 mm². The measured total power consumption is 746 nW, with 0.8 V power supply at 2.5 kHz real-time operating clock. It can detect 13 abnormal cardiac rhythms with a sensitivity and specificity of 99.10% and 99.5%. The number of detectable ACR types far exceeds the other low power designs in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abubakar et al. (2022) studied this question. The ECG processor achieved 99.10% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity while detecting 13 abnormal cardiac rhythms at only 746 nW power consumption.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: