Key result
Novel aVR-based ECG criteria achieve ~85% diagnostic accuracy for cardiac amyloidosis.
Why the study?
Classical ECG signs have inferior diagnostic accuracy compared to echocardiographic myocardial deformation criteria in diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis, prompting the search for more accurate novel ECG criteria.
Do novel ECG criteria improve the diagnostic accuracy for recognizing cardiac amyloidosis compared to classical ECG criteria in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy?
Do novel ECG criteria improve the diagnostic accuracy for recognizing cardiac amyloidosis compared to classical ECG criteria in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy?
Novel ECG criteria utilizing limb lead voltages and ratios offer high diagnostic accuracy for identifying cardiac amyloidosis, performing comparably to established echocardiographic criteria.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support ECG screening for cardiac amyloidosis in LVH; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Aims The early diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is paramount, since there are effective therapies that improve patient survival. The diagnostic accuracy of classical electrocardiographic (ECG) signs, such as low voltage, pseudoinfarct pattern, and conduction disturbances in the diagnosis of CA, is inferior to that of the echocardiographic myocardial deformation criteria; therefore, our aim was to find more accurate novel ECG criteria for this purpose. Methods We tested the diagnostic value of five novel ECG criteria, two of them devised by us, in 34 patients with confirmed CA (20 transthyretin amyloidosis and 14 AL amyloidosis) and 45 control patients with left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiography due to hypertension, valvular aortic stenosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The following novel ECG criteria, that suggested CA, were tested: QRS amplitude in lead I < 0.55 mV (I < 0.55); QRS amplitude in lead aVR < 0.5 mV (aVR < 0.5); average QRS amplitude of leads I + aVR < 0.575 mV [(I + aVR) < 0.575]; average QRS amplitude of leads I + aVR/average QRS amplitude of leads V 1–4 < 0.375 [(I + aVR)/(V 1–4 ) < 0.375]; average QRS amplitude of leads I + aVR/longest intrinsicoid deflection in leads I,aVL,V 1–6 < 0.0115 [(I + aVR)/I,aVL,V 1–6 ID < 0.0115]. Results The I < 0.55, aVR < 0.5, (I + aVR) < 0.575, (I + aVR)/(V 1–4 ) < 0.375, (I + aVR)/I,aVL,V 1–6 ID < 0.0115 test accuracy (TA) were 81%, 84.8%, 82.3%, 84.8%, and 83.3%, respectively; the sensitivity (SE): 76.5%, 82.4%, 85.3%, 82.4%, and 76.9%; specificity (SP): 84.4%, 86.7%, 80%, 86.7%, and 87.5%; positive predictive values (PPV): 78.8%, 82.4%, 76.3%, 82.4%, and 80%; negative predictive values (NPV): 82.6%, 86.7%, 87.8%, 86.7%, and 85.4%; area under curve (AUC) values: 0.8922, 0.8794, 09016, 0.8824, and 0.8462 were respectively. These parameters of the novel ECG criteria were at least as good as those reported by other authors in the literature of the qualitative (TA: 67%, SE: 80%, SP: 34%, PPV: 75%, NPV: 42%, AUC: 0.57) and quantitative apical sparing (TA: 64–80%, SE: 66–81.3%, SP: 55–78.3%, PPV: 33–83.9%, NPV: 41–75%, AUC: 0.62–0.68) and left ventricular ejection fraction/global longitudinal strain >4.1 (TA: 77%, SE: 93%, SP: 38%, PPV: 79%, NPV: 69%, AUC: 0.65) echocardiographic criteria. Among the classical criteria, the low voltage in limb leads criterion was present most frequently (in 73.5%) in patients with CA, with slightly worse diagnostic value than the novel ECG criteria (TA: 78.5%, SE: 73.5%, SP: 82.2%, PPV: 75.8%, NPV: 80.4%). Conclusions The novel ECG criteria [mostly the aVR < 0.5, (I + aVR)/(V 1–4 ) < 0.375] seem at least as reliable in the diagnosis of CA as the best echocardiographic myocardial deformation criteria and might be used either together with the echocardiographic criteria or as stand‐alone criteria to diagnose CA in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vereckei et al. (2024) studied this question. The novel ECG criteria aVR < 0.5 and (I + aVR)/(V 1–4) < 0.375 demonstrated diagnostic accuracy of 84.8% and 84.8%, respectively, for cardiac amyloidosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: