Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A nomogram predicts long-term pain resilience in knee osteoarthritis, suggesting improved clinical assessments.
Knee osteoarthritis prognostic tools often target structural progression or surgery and require imaging or biomarker inputs that are not routinely available. Using Osteoarthritis Initiative data, we developed a fully clinical nomogram to estimate both the probability of long-term pain non-resilience (clinically important worsening) and, by complement, maintenance of acceptable pain in radiographic knee osteoarthritis. We included participants with radiographic knee osteoarthritis and complete worst-knee WOMAC pain scores at baseline, 24 and 48 months; non-resilience was defined as a ≥9-point increase on the 0–100 WOMAC pain scale over 4 years. A six-predictor Firth logistic regression model (age, body mass index, Kellgren–Lawrence grade, baseline pain, 0–24-month pain change and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score) was fitted and translated into a point-based nomogram. Among 2365 eligible participants, 527 (22.3%) were non-resilient. The model showed good performance, with optimism-corrected AUC 0.74 and Brier score 0.15, and decision-curve analysis indicated positive net benefit versus treat-none across 1–15% thresholds and small gains versus treat-all. Early pain worsening and higher depressive symptoms were the strongest predictors of non-resilience. This six-variable, clinic-ready nomogram provides a simple, well-calibrated tool for prognostic counseling and risk stratification in radiographic knee osteoarthritis and requires external validation before wider clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alkhatatbeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: