Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis compares Latour and Arendt on the sciences' role in responding to Anthropocene crises, suggesting a novel political approach.
What role should the sciences play in a politically vibrant and just response to the Anthropocene crises? To engage this question, I contrast Latour’s and Arendt’s understanding of the role of sensing and sense-making in political action. Latour’s Gaian theory (especially his “sensing loops”) privileges the scientific ontology as a starting point for terrestrial politics. In contrast, Arendt’s phenomenological approach rooted political action in embodied experience contextualized through dialogue with others: in “common sense”. Emplaced and embodied transdisciplinary inquiry, I argue, offers a fertile starting point for an epistemologically just Anthropocene politics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna Krzywoszynska (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: