Position paper argues for a radical epistemological shift in the governance of the Anthropocene, suggesting new frameworks.
This position paper, published by the European School of Governance, argues that governing the Anthropocene demands nothing less than a fundamental epistemological transformation. Moving beyond post-modernity, post-growth, and post-truth, the paper contends that the challenges of the 21st century cannot be met by new models and methods alone but require a rethinking of the very conditions under which knowledge and meaning are constituted. The paper traces three intellectual traditions capable of contributing to this epistemological turn: systems sciences and cybernetics, which since the 1950s have advanced non-linear, non-reductionist approaches to complexity and emergence; integral theory, which bridges sociological and psychological perspectives on individual and collective development; and the theory of resonance, developed by Hartmut Rosa, which proposes resonance as a counterweight to the accelerations of modern life. Drawing on thinkers including Heinz von Foerster, Niklas Luhmann, Ken Wilber, and Marvin Minsky, the paper calls for a new systemic Enlightenment, one that acknowledges the primacy of context, the limits of dualistic logic, and the role of beauty, vibrance, and sound as carriers of meaning. Anthropocene Thinking is presented as a transdisciplinary, community-based invitation to venture beyond the thinking that created the crises we now face.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Louis Klein (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: