Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case series evaluates safety of robot-assisted subretinal injections in patients with submacular hemorrhage, highlighting feasibility and precision.
Purpose: To evaluate feasibility and safety of robot-assisted subretinal injections through attached retina using the comanipulated Mynutia system in patients with submacular hemorrhage (SMH). Methods: This prospective, single-center case series included 20 eyes undergoing vitrectomy with subretinal recombinant tissue plasminogen activator between June 2024 and August 2025. The EVA Inicio™ microinjection system with a 38G needle was mounted on the Mynutia system. Injections were performed through attached retina when feasible. Primary outcomes were successful needle insertion, stable subretinal positioning for ≥3 minutes, safe withdrawal, and absence of device-associated adverse events (DAE). Secondary outcomes included injection parameters, hemorrhage displacement, visual outcomes, and complications. Results: Robot-assisted injection succeeded in all eyes; one required injection into the SMH due to anatomy. Mean injection duration was 178 ± 34 s (max 400), but the needle tip was maintained in the subretinal space ≥3 minutes in all cases. No DAE occurred. Retinotomies closed spontaneously without visible reflux. Mean bleb initiation and propagation pressures were 10.3 ± 3.2 and 3.0 [3.0–3.25] PSI, respectively; internal limiting membrane peeling reduced initiation pressure (p < 0.05). Complete subfoveal displacement was achieved in 95%. Median BCVA improved from LogMAR 1.85 (counting fingers) to 0.66 (20/90) at 6 weeks (p < 0.001). Adverse events included hyphema (5%), ocular hypertension (5%), vitreous hemorrhage (25%; 80% self-limited), RPE tear (20%), and recurrent SMH (5%). Conclusions: Robot-assisted subretinal injection with Mynutia is feasible and safe, enabling stable, prolonged low-pressure delivery through attached retina, and may enhance precision and tissue preservation in subretinal therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clerck et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: