Key result
eHealth CR boosts post-PCI physical activity ~114% and improves quality of life vs standard care.
Why the study?
Participation and compliance with cardiac exercise rehabilitation after PCI remain suboptimal, and remote rehabilitation via mobile health technology can help overcome traditional rehabilitation barriers.
Does an eHealth cardiac rehabilitation platform added to standard care improve physical activity levels in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Population
180 patients with CHD after PCI in Hangzhou, China
Comparison
eHealth CR platform based on persuasive systems design plus standard CR vs standard CR alone
Design
Single-blinded parallel randomized controlled trial
Follow-up
12 weeks of follow-up after 12 weeks of intervention
Authors
Loading...
Supports eHealth cardiac rehabilitation post-PCI; strengthens RCT evidence for digital platforms in coronary disease.
RCT
Single-blind
Parallel
No
Does an eHealth cardiac rehabilitation platform added to standard care improve physical activity levels in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention?
Mean Difference: 937.29 (95% CI 867.61–1006.97)
Absolute Event Rate: 1723% vs 805.5%
p-value: p=<.001
An eHealth cardiac rehabilitation platform based on the persuasive systems design model significantly improved physical activity, exercise endurance, and quality of life in patients after PCI.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Coronary Heart Disease. eHealth Cardiac Exercise Rehabilitation Platform vs. Standard care (in-hospital education, exercise guidance, and follow-up support) was evaluated on Physical activity level (Metabolic Equivalent Task minutes per week) (β coefficient 937.29, 95% CI 867.61-1006.97, p=<.001). An eHealth cardiac exercise rehabilitation platform significantly increased physical activity levels by 937.29 MET-minutes/week compared to standard care in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: