Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates KFL listening subskills in college students, highlighting the importance of extended instruction for improvement.
This study investigated the development of Korean as a foreign language (KFL) listening subskills among learners at a university on the United States–Mexico border. Using a mock Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK), 10 KFL listening subskills were identified based on L2 listening research. KFL students’ progress was examined across three groups: Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3, corresponding to 90, 135, and 180 instructional hours, respectively. A total of 148 students took a mock test at the end of the semester (Class 1: n = 77, Class 2: n = 48, Class 3: n = 23). MANOVA analysis found a significant main effect of class (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.657, p < 0.001). Between-group comparisons showed significant improvements in two subskills (V2 and V7) from Class 1 to Class 2 and four subskills (V4, V5, V8, and V10) from Class 2 to Class 3. However, V3 and V9 did not show a statistically significant difference. This study discussed the impact of text length, cognitive complexity, and instructional hours on KFL listening development. Demonstrating that higher-level listening improves after 180 hours of instruction at the university level, this study highlights the need for structured, long-term instruction to promote KFL proficiency development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minhee Eom (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: