Demonstrates endothelial dysfunction in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome, suggesting implications for cardiovascular health.
Introduction: Primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by arterial/venous thrombosis and/or obstetric pathology in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Evidence suggests that aPL directly interact with membrane phospholipids of endothelial cells, leading to endothelial dysfunction (ED) and accelerating atherosclerosis. Methods: This study aimed to establish the presence of ED, expressed by a decrease in the percentage of flow-mediated brachial artery dilation (FMD), in a cohort of 100 Serbian PAPS patients without previously diagnosed cardiovascular disease. All participants underwent clinical evaluation to identify standard atherosclerotic risk factors. Tested aPL included: lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL IgG/IgM), and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (a-β2GPI IgG/IgM). FMD was measured following standardized patient preparation and compared to results from 80 healthy controls. Results: The study cohort consisted predominantly of females age 47.7 ± 8.5 years with a low prevalence of conventional risk factors. ED, reflected by reduced FMD values, was present in 37.6% of PAPS patients, significantly more than in the control group (p = 0.0001). Age (p = 0.041) and glycemia value (p = 0.045) were significantly associated with ED. However, aPL type and clinical manifestations were not. Multivariate regression including age, glycemia value and thrombosis history showed no independent predictors of ED. Conclusion: ED is significantly more prevalent in PAPS patients than in healthy individuals, and represents a direct consequence of the autoimmune process. Earlier involvement of a cardiologist and appropriate management may reduce the risk of future cardiovascular complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bogović et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: